Minority business homeowners face challenges when starting or expanding a small business, including access to inexpensive small-business loans. Mitch I really like your article but I see a potential downside with the principle premise, I admit that possibly my understanding of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and its amendments is flawed too. Also if it is a publicly traded company, although not related to the government, then it is the free market equivalent of public funds.\n\nWhy discrimination, as a result of it violates a persons’ RIGHT to Liberty, Happiness, Traquility, and Justice, which ARE guaranteed by the Constitution. Preventing a person from being hired simply because of bigotry violates every a kind of RIGHTs which the Constitution guarantees and Congress is certain to protect.\n\nMitch, I do understand your argument, I just don’t agree with it. I simply don’t imagine a business particular person has carte blanche leeway to hire whomever he or she chooses, when those choices violate certain civil and human rights. You, then again, do imagine they should have such leeway although you personally imagine in those rights in other circumstances.\n\nI don’t suppose it was for these simple information; 1) in writing the requirements for ratification, the framers made certain the question went to the Folks of each state and not the state’s legislature. The Constitution required each state to create its own Constitutional Convention, separtate from the state gov’t to resolve on ratification.\n\nAll of those folks imagine certain folks, because of their class of race or gender, may be barred by non-public or state decree from taking part in varied features of public life, simply because they belong to that class. The conservative supreme courts prior to then, not only found that the federal gov’t had no business protecting individual rights, in addition they found that the states didn’t either.